Greenwashing: when green is just a veneer

byGiulia/20/08/2024 08:30

12822-greenwashing-web

In a world of growing environmental awareness, more and more companies are seeking to position themselves as responsible, sustainable players. However, some have resorted to deceptive practices known as “greenwashing“. This term refers to misleading or exaggerated communication about the environmental benefits of a product, service or company as a whole. Behind tempting green claims often lie far less glamorous realities. We take a closer look at this worrying phenomenon.

Definition and origins of greenwashing

Greenwashing, a contraction of “green” and “whitewashing”, consists in giving a misleading ecological image to a company, product or service. This marketing practice aims to capitalize on growing consumer demand for environmentally-friendly products, without actually making any lasting changes within the company.

The origins of greenwashing date back to the 1960s, when some companies began using environmental arguments in their communications to boost their image. However, it was in the 1980s and 1990s, with the emergence of the environmental movement, that greenwashing really took off.

The different forms of greenwashing

Greenwashing can take many forms, from simple exaggeration to outright disinformation. Here are some common examples:

– Misuse of green terms: Words like “natural”, “ecological”, “sustainable” or “green” are misleadingly used to suggest environmental benefits without any real justification.

– Vague, unsubstantiated claims: General claims such as “environmentally friendly” or “green product” are made without tangible proof or details of the company’s actual practices.

– Selective highlighting of positive aspects: A company highlights a minor aspect of its business that is environmentally friendly, while glossing over the far greater negative impacts of its other activities.

Capture d’écran 2024-06-11 à 09.56.41

ce0c5a6_1705326843446-pedago-green-decodeur

– Questionable labels and certifications: Some companies create their own “green” labels or certifications without any real credibility or independent control.

– Misleading comparisons: A company compares its product to an earlier, less environmentally-friendly version, rather than to truly sustainable alternatives on the market.

The consequences of greenwashing

Beyond deceiving consumers, greenwashing has harmful consequences on several levels:

– Loss of consumer confidence: When greenwashing practices come to light, they seriously damage the credibility and image not only of the company concerned, but of the industry as a whole.

– Distortion of competition: companies that really practice sustainable development find themselves at a disadvantage compared with those that are content with a green veneer.

– A brake on sustainable innovation: By giving the illusion that progress is being made, greenwashing can slow down genuine efforts to innovate in favor of the environment.

– Legal risks: In many countries, greenwashing is considered a deceptive commercial practice and can lead to legal action.

Fighting greenwashing

Faced with these challenges, it is crucial to combat greenwashing and promote transparent, honest environmental communication. Here are a few ideas for action:

Reinforcing regulations

An increasing number of countries are adopting regulations to regulate environmental claims in advertising and marketing. These regulations define strict criteria and require tangible proof to avoid abuse.

Promoting credible certifications

There are numerous environmental certifications recognized and controlled by independent bodies (European Ecolabel, FSC, PEFC, etc.). By choosing these certifications, consumers can rely on reliable guarantees.

Encouraging transparency

Companies must be encouraged, if not obliged, to publish detailed sustainability reports verified by independent third parties. This transparency enables consumers to form their own opinion about the real environmental efforts being made.

Raising consumer awareness

It is essential to train and educate consumers so that they are able to decipher environmental claims and recognize greenwashing practices. An informed population is less likely to be fooled.

Encouraging whistle-blowing

The competent authorities, consumer associations and the media must facilitate and encourage the reporting of proven cases of greenwashing. These public denunciations are an effective way of dissuading companies from resorting to these deceptive practices.

Promoting best practices

Rather than focusing solely on denunciation, it’s important to highlight and reward companies that demonstrate genuine, credible and transparent environmental initiatives.

Découvrez CircularPlace, la plateforme de recyclage !

#greenwashing #startup #environment #green #WeAreCircular

Tags :circulareconomy, commitment, ecologicaltransition, ecology, environment, greenwashing, impact, sustainabledevelopment

Read also

Circular co-creation between companies and communities

13/08/2024

Circular economy takes off in companies

08/08/2024

Training for a circular economy in the workplace

06/08/2024

Taxation, a lever for the circular transition

01/08/2024

Upcycling and recovery: circular models for the future

30/07/2024

Reuse: the challenge of overcoming logistical obstacles

25/07/2024

Questions about CircularPlace?